Forums

Im trying to test it right now but Im not too good with Applied energistics... What component of the me network is your OC adapter touching? I have it touching the me_interface but I dont have the component method me_interface.getAvailableItems() just me_interface.getItemsInNetwork(). And the list doesnt appear to show the correct amount of items or any at all really... just an empty list "{n=0}" I updated to 1.12.2 and now the me_interface.getItemsInNetwork() method returns a populated list however I still dont have the me_interface.getAvailableItems() method.. Anything I need to know about how your ME network is setup or configured? Remember im an ME noob so help me help you

thai is the original cc program that worked for years and still works technicaly me = peripheral.wrap("tileinterface_3")
mon = peripheral.wrap("monitor_29")
low = 64 mon.setTextScale(0.5) local meItems = {
[1] = {"Iron Ingot","minecraft:iron_ingot","0"},
[2] = {"Sand", "minecraft:sand","0"},
[3] = {"Acasia Wood","minecraft:log2","0"},
[4] = {"Acasia Planks","minecraft:planks","4"},
[5] = {"SawDust","Mekanism:Sawdust","0"},
[6] = {"Paper","minecraft:paper","0"},
[7] = {"Cactus","minecraft:cactus","0"},
[8] = {"Cactus Green","minecraft:dye","2"},
[9] = {"Ink","minecraft:dye","0"},
[10] = {"Red Dye","minecraft:dye","1"},
[11] = {"Purple Dye","minecraft:dye","5"},
[12] = {"Gray Dye","minecraft:dye","8"},
[13] = {"Light Gray Dye","minecraft:dye","7"},
[14] = {"Light Blue Dye","minecraft:dye","12"},
[15] = {"Dandyline Yellow","minecraft:dye","11"},
[16] = {"Aluminium Ingots","TConstruct:materials","11"},
[17] = {"Stone","minecraft:stone","0"},
[18] = {"CobbleStone","minecraft:cobblestone","0"},
[19] = {"Gold Ingots","minecraft:gold_ingot","0"},
[20] = {"Copper Ingots","Mekanism:Ingot","5"},
[21] = {"GlowStone Dust","minecraft;glowstone_dust","0"},
[22] = {"Glass","minecraft:glass","0"}
} function checkMe(checkName, name)
  melist = me.getAvailableItems()
  for a = 1, #melist do
    itemName = melist[a].fingerprint.id .. melist[a].fingerprint.dmg
    value = tostring(melist[a].size)
    if itemName == checkName then
      print("true")
      print(name)
      print("me=" ..itemName)
      print("var=" ..checkName)
      print("sum=" ..value)
      centerT(name, row+2, colors.black,colors.blue, "lefty")
      if tonumber(value) <= low then
        centerT(value, row+2,colors.black, colors.red, "righty")
      else
        centerT(value, row+2,colors.black, colors.green, "righty")
      end
      row=row+1
    end
  end
end function checkTable()
  row = 1
  clearScreen()
  for i = 1, #meItems do
    checkName = meItems[2] .. meItems[3]
    name = meItems[1]
    checkMe(checkName, name)
  end
end     function clearScreen()
  mon.setBackgroundColor(colors.black)
  mon.clear()
  mon.setCursorPos(1,1)
  centerT("  ME Inventory  ",1,colors.blue, colors.white,"head")
end function centerT(text,line,txtback,txtcolor,pos)
  monX,monY = mon.getSize()
  mon.setBackgroundColor(txtback)
  mon.setTextColor(txtcolor)
  length = string.len(text)
  dif = math.floor(monX-length)
  x = math.floor(dif/2)
  if pos == "head" then
    mon.setCursorPos(x+1, line)
    mon.write(text)
  elseif pos == "lefty" then
    mon.setCursorPos(2,line)
    mon.write(text)
  elseif pos == "righty" then
    mon.setCursorPos(monX-length, line)
    mon.write(text)
  end
end while true do
  checkTable()
  sleep(10)
end

centerT func looks fine.. I'd suspect the checkMe func, specifically the loop over the list, or the list length operator. Check that the list is actually reporting the proper length? Shove a few print calls in there to debug.. I can't test ATM but nothing is standing out as the culprit.

Singleplayer. I'm using the FTB launcher and just playing it singleplayer.   It's hard to believe that it would be my PC doing this somehow as I get 60+FPS right until I turn the computer on. As soon as I do though I get these frame drops down to zero for a few seconds every now and then. Then when I turn the computer off, everything is fine again. Normally I'm playing with around 200 mod files running at the same time and it all runs just fine until that happens. Then again I seem to be the only one having this problem too so, I don't know what to make of it.

Hmmm, since I am the server owner and my mate has no probles with it, I can test the current version of your script in 1.7.10 and will see, if I can create a void in the void or if the reactor will still be there
Give me one or two days and I'll share my experiences and what I have used in the config