Jump to content
  • Sky
  • Blueberry
  • Slate
  • Blackcurrant
  • Watermelon
  • Strawberry
  • Orange
  • Banana
  • Apple
  • Emerald
  • Chocolate
  • Charcoal

XyFreak

Members
  • Content Count

    401
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Everything posted by XyFreak

  1. Okidoki, I found an issue with the calibration of reactors with > 50 B/t steam output. The fix will be published tomorrow. I was not able to reproduce the issue with the turbines not speeding up. Can you tell me how big your energy delta (in RF/t) is/was? If a turbine still has energy stored, the controller will not power on additional turbines. Also, the controller tries to estimate the suspended turbines energy output and enables only the ones that're required to fit your energy needs. From what you told me (turbine spinning up and down) you have quite irregular energy needs
  2. I'll look into it, thanks for reporting the issue.
  3. Hey Chaoschaot234, ---Server--- unfortunately, the delay caused by the OC networking "stack" would make the controller pretty unreliable. Having a central controller for multiple reactors via wireless lan is not going to happen. HOWEVER: If you don't want a graphical interface, you can run the controller on a T2 computer without any trouble (maybe T1 - I have to test that). You can also setup a single computer/server to controll all reactors locally. The GUI being able to display the state of all reactors is definitely on my long-term TODO-list. If you want, I can implement netw
  4. Haha yeah the 1.9 MRF/t avg settings ARE scary. "Burn mode" is not the final stage but more like the initial stage where it burns through a lot of fuel to get more RF/t earlier. The reactor generates more and more energy, there more fuel it has converted to chaos. That's why you get higher average output at the cost of efficiency. You can set "burnRFt" to 0 to disable that. That'll also make things less scary . If you're using my settings It'll stay in burn mode until the reactor generates 2M RF/t (a few hours). -XyFreak
  5. Ok I updated my Draconic Evolution and it turns out they changed some of their API. I've adjusted the controller. You can update to the latest version (1.3) by simply running the insaller again. Thanks for bringing that to my attention - I propably wouldn't have noticed that for a bit -XyFreak
  6. Hi there. "UNKNOWN" means the controller has not yet/wasn't able to query the reactor info. Can you please run a "draconic_control runOnce" and see if it throws an error? -XyFreak Edit: Can you also post your configuration? Just for reference.
  7. Hi everyone. A while back I promised more releases, so here you go: Big Reactors Grid Control is a multi reactor/turbine controller for Big Reactors and Extreme Reactors. Mission goal: Be the best big reactors controller there is. Nothing more, nothing less. First things first - here's the website: https://tenyx.de/brgc/ NOTE: Due to a bug with OpenOS 1.7.4, BRGC will not work with that version. Please update to 1.7.5. Main features Active and passive reactor support Support for multiple reactors and turbines at the same time (n:m) Control
  8. Hi guys, Draconic Control will be the first program I'll be releasing (more to come). The important stuff first: By now there are quite a few programs out there to control draconic reactors. However most of these don't even get close to about 1 MR/t. With this program 1.9 MRF/t (on average) is very well possible. Of course if you're not interested in RF/t but only total RF generated, this program is for you as well. Also, this one has a nice gui. Go check it out here: https://tenyx.de/draconic_control/ Yes, it comes with yet another (unrelease
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.