make opencomputers processors faster

[Ta©ti Tac0Z 2]

i'm currecly useing CC becuse of the fact that the speed of witch lua commands is run is based on a speed factor in the processor item limiting the update speed of a program

OC is better that CC in all otherways then this, CC does not limit speed (not on purpes anyway) nor does it limit the amout of RAM a spesific computer can use (allso CC have made too much of an effort optimiseing the mod for servers makeing CC look like a simplyfired version of OC - witch i supose it is)

 

anyway of removieing (i know that ain't going to happen) the limit or at least let the computers run faster?

[Izaya 19]

The actual Lua interpreter in OC is probably faster than ComputerCraft - OpenComputers Lua is running natively most of the time, whereas ComputerCraft is running an interpreter written in Java.

That said, the performance hit you're describing is due to the limit on component calls. This is due to the fact that you can only do one component call per tick, for server performance reasons (Don't get me started on CC and server performance...). You can make them faster with the help of another mod, I believe it's Magic Bees, which adds a number of species of bees that manipulate how many ticks occur for blocks around a hive, making computers able to access components faster.

[Molinko 43]

@Izaya that magic bees info is actually interesting, thx.

[Ta©ti Tac0Z 2]

right... how lovely... ONLY ONE COMPONENT CALL PER TICK!!! JESUS duckING CRIST... that most be a joke, right?

[Ta©ti Tac0Z 2]

but if thats the case what is the defrence betwine the processors then? i tested it once and there was a defrence of the speed

am really sad that OC (funny i said that about CC two hmmmm... at least CC only limits resolution and color) is doing so much to optimise servers the call limit makes it so am only allowed to call a screen command 4 times a sec even the 70/80's computers chould do 40 times that i know that whould breake a minecraft server at least have a singerplayer mode or some thing so i can breake my own computer then, if i chould i whold make my own perfect computer mod but emmm... but that ain't going to happen right now is it?

 

also once again: CC pulled it off why can't OC then?

[Fingercomp 37]

Please calm down.

There are some component methods that block the computer for a tick when called, yes. Such methods usually interact with the world. For example, a transposer allows to transfer items between invetories by calling the transferItem method, which takes a tick to execute (so you get up to 20 stacks/second).

On the other hand, there are a lot of direct methods, which can be called several times per tick. For example, the GPU's methods are direct. And the processor (as well as RAM) determines how many direct calls are allowed per tick. I think T2 T3 setup allows you to call gpu.get one thousand times every tick. Or 256 gpu.sets. Or 128 gpu.fills.

I also believe you don't realize how bad ComputerCraft is for servers. A really simple and stupidly-written program can eat up all the memory the server has. That's why OC limits the memory available for an in-game computer. And running CPU-intensive tasks on a CC's computer makes the whole server run slow, whereas OC requires scripts to pause to allow other in-game computer to run. OpenComputers imposes the limits not because the mod developers want users to suffer (although I do sometimes think of that when I try to do some stupidly complex things with it), but to make it server-friendly.

What's important is that OC allows you to configure these limits for your needs. Have you opened its configuration file? It is more than a 1.5k lines long, and has more than 300 settings you can change, each with a comment that explains the effect of the setting. There's callBudgets to increase the direct call number limit. Or decrease it. There's also the ramSizes setting for memory, and hddSizes for the HDD sizes.

But even with all of these limits, OC can run a lot of programs, including graphical shells, 3D games, reactor control systems. It allows you to send HTTP requests to the real websites, and open raw TCP sockets to interact with network services. It can display 320x200 images. It can even play videos — inside the game, and on the default OC settings!

[Izaya 19]

For what it's worth:

[ben_mkiv 9]

The bee in question is the temporal species from careerbees but im not sure if it allows you more indirect component calls. probably not

[Gorzoid 10]

So what your saying is we should use the torcherino mod to make our computers run at 1780 TPS?

[Ta©ti Tac0Z 2]

On 8/17/2018 at 5:53 PM, Fingercomp said:

But even with all of these limits, OC can run a lot of programs, including graphical shells, 3D games, reactor control systems. It allows you to send HTTP requests to the real websites, and open raw TCP sockets to interact with network services. It can display 320x200 images. It can even play videos — inside the game, and on the default OC settings!

all that but the resolotion thing computercraft can do as well but thats off topic tho

its true there is no RAM limit made by CC's code (CC have low resolution and 4bit color insted tho)

also the only way i can think of that 320X200 images is posible is with costom charectors

 

On 8/17/2018 at 5:53 PM, Fingercomp said:

 I think T2 setup allows you to call gpu.get one thousand times every tick

T2 means tier 2 right?

well yeah it only outputs some values from memory

 

On 8/17/2018 at 5:53 PM, Fingercomp said:

Or 256 gpu.sets

hmmm you're sure about this? where is the source? a while back i tryed to make a image format but it ran so slowly so it was unuseable i guess my format was extremly unoptimized then, now i made a format in CC witch runs both video (about 5/10 fps) and music at the same time

[Ta©ti Tac0Z 2]

cm = require("component")
term = require("term")

term.clear()

mx,my = cm.gpu.getResolution()

gpu = cm.gpu

i = -1

startTime = computer.uptime()

--while true do
  for x = 1,mx do
    for y = 1,my do
      i = i + 1

      if i == 0 then
        color = 0xff0000
      elseif i == 1 then
        color = 0x00ff00
      elseif i == 2 then
        color = 0x0000ff
      else
        color = 0xffff00
        i = -1
      end


      gpu.setBackground(color)

      gpu.set(x,y," ")
    end
  end

gpu.setBackground(0)
term.clear()
time = (computer.uptime()-startTime)
--print(os.time(), startTime)
print("it took")
print(time)




--end

(i forgot to add a require for computer)

that program draws a "checker-patten" (i belive its called) on the screen and prints how long time it takes in IRL sec as we can see the secs sems to avg. at 3.65 sec! (while useing the createive APU) so there most be a way to optimize this, right?

[Fingercomp 37]

Yeah, there is a way to make it faster. In fact, way faster. One of the things that makes it slow is... gpu.setBackground. It's quite expensive in terms of perfomance (tier 3 GPUs consume 1/128 of the call budget when this method is called). Fortunately, your program only involves 4 colors, so it can be easily optimized.

Actually, there are two ways to do it. A somewhat naive way would be to process all cells of one color first, then process all cells of another color, etc. That would solve the issue with gpu.setBackground, but there's another thing to worry about. The gpu.set method isn't free. In fact, that program does 160 × 50 = 8000 sets, assuming it's running on the max tier 3 resolution. And that is a lot.

Fortunately, OC supports Unicode. In particular, there's a character in Unicode called a full block — █. On OC, I prefer to think of it as of an inverse of " " (a space). If the foreground and background colors are swapped, the space would look like the full block, and vice versa. And it can help us reduce amount of GPU calls significantly. Try replacing the loops with the following:

-- i = 0
gpu.setBackground(0xff0000)
gpu.set(1, 1, " ")

-- i = 1
gpu.setBackground(0x00ff00)
gpu.set(1, 2, " ")

-- i = 2, 3
gpu.setForeground(0xffff00)
gpu.setBackground(0x0000ff)

local fullBlock = "\u{2588}"
local oddRow = (" " .. fullBlock):rep(math.floor(mx / 2))
local evenRow = (fullBlock .. " "):rep(math.floor(mx / 2))

for y = 1, my do
  local x = 1

  if y % 2 == 1 then
    if y == 1 then
      -- Shift the x by 2 to the right to avoid rewriting
      -- the first two characters.
      -- OC truncates everything that goes out of the screen bounds,
      -- so there's no need to worry about that.
      x = x + 2
    end

    gpu.set(x, y, oddRow)
  else
    gpu.set(x, y, evenRow)
  end
end

I can't launch Minecraft to run the program and measure the render time, but I can calculate the amount of call budget consumed by the GPU. Assuming the program runs on a tier 3 GPU and screen, there are 4 gpu.setForeground/gpu.setBackground calls, and 52 gpu.set calls. We get (4 × 1 / 128) + (52 × 1 / 256) = 15 / 64 ≈ 0.23. This is enough even if you have a tier 1 processor (whose call budget is 0.5), and the program should be able to run at 20 FPS, though it doesn't really change each frame.

8 hours ago, noahthegame said:

hmmm you're sure about this?

Oh, I meant to say "T3" (tier 3), sorry. A tier 2 GPU can only perform 128 sets and 64 fills.

8 hours ago, noahthegame said:

where is the source?

https://github.com/MightyPirates/OpenComputers/blob/master-MC1.7.10/src/main/scala/li/cil/oc/server/component/GraphicsCard.scala#L55-L60

Also, there's a comment a few lines above in that file, which reminds me of yet another reason OC makes indirect calls take 1 tick to run — synchronization. OpenComputers, very much unlike ComputerCraft, saves the state of running computers so that they can be resumed when the chunk is reloaded. Methods that interact with the world in some way (like moving items around) must perform synchronization with the Minecraft world to avoid, well, messing things up. The comment says it's especially important on world saves. Despite that, the GPU methods were made direct, although a "nasty trick" was needed to do this. Well, safe concurrency is hard to achieve.

[Ta©ti Tac0Z 2]

0.04 sec

 

but the hole idea is to being able to draw pixel per pixel

you're looking in opencomputers source do you have any idea where OC gets the charector textures from? from unicode i know but is there some kind of unicode api or some thing?

[Fingercomp 37]

23 minutes ago, noahthegame said:

but the hole idea is to being able to draw pixel per pixel

OC sets significant limits the GPU, which make it much harder to do more advanced graphics. You can optimize the calls at the cost of high RAM usage — storing data in a buffer and only drawing the cells that changed since the last buffer flush. It isn't really an easy thing to implement yourself, so you might want to use a buffering library someone else made — here's one that definitely works, for example. I was also making one, but it's not yet ready.

23 minutes ago, noahthegame said:

do you have any idea where OC gets the charector textures from?

OpenComputers has a font.hex file, which is the font that's used to render characters on the screen. Since OC 1.6, asie's funscii font is used.

28 minutes ago, noahthegame said:

is there some kind of unicode api

Let's make things clear.

• Unicode is a standard that assigns numbers (codepoints) to a ton of characters (glyphs from different scripts, math symbols, emoji, and some other random things).
• UTF-8 is one of the possible encodings for Unicode symbols, and it's fairly the most popular one used. It converts a character codepoint, like U+2588, to a sequence of bytes. We need an encoding because a byte can only contain 256 values, while Unicode has 137439 characters. OpenComputers (and a lot of other software) supports UTF-8 and uses it to encode characters.
• OpenComputers provides the Unicode API for Lua 5.2 and Lua 5.3 architectures. You can use it to convert codepoints to characters and perform other operations on UTF-8 strings.
• Lua 5.3 also exports the utf8 library. It has a few functions that Unicode API doesn't provide, but is unavailable for Lua 5.2.

[Ta©ti Tac0Z 2]

1 hour ago, Fingercomp said:

OpenComputers has a font.hex file, which is the font that's used to render characters on the screen. Since OC 1.6, asie's funscii font is used.

ok, then

 

1 hour ago, Fingercomp said:

OC sets significant limits the GPU, which make it much harder to do more advanced graphics. You can optimize the calls at the cost of high RAM usage — storing data in a buffer and only drawing the cells that changed since the last buffer flush. It isn't really an easy thing to implement yourself, so you might want to use a buffering library someone else made — here's one that definitely works, for example. I was also making one, but it's not yet ready.so that

so i can see that buffer api thing have the standart gpu functions so i give the infomation to the buffer (eg buffer.set(2,2,0xff0000, 0, " ")) and the buffer api will only do a gpu.set opration when it has to limting unnessary gpu.set's? is that how that works?

[Ta©ti Tac0Z 2]

i think i have found a bug in the that buffering api it works once but then i need to restart the computer for it to work again? do i need to close the buffer before my program ends or some thing?

[Fingercomp 37]

2 hours ago, noahthegame said:

so i give the infomation to the buffer (eg buffer.set(2,2,0xff0000, 0, " ")) and the buffer api will only do a gpu.set opration when it has to limting unnessary gpu.set's? is that how that works?

Yeah, basically.

1 hour ago, noahthegame said:

i think i have found a bug in the that buffering api it works once but then i need to restart the computer for it to work again? do i need to close the buffer before my program ends or some thing?

The buffer is a singleton. In other words, there's only a single buffer instance in the memory, which is kept there even if programs that required the library exited. An implication of this fact is that buffer may be non-empty when you start your program; therefore, before you use the buffer, you need to do a buffer.clear() followed by a forceful render: buffer.drawChanges(true). It's been a long time since I've used that library, though. Things might have changed. Considering there aren't proper releases and commit descriptions, it's rather difficult to navigate through the commit history.

[Ta©ti Tac0Z 2]

i tryed to do buffer.clear() but got a tryed to call a nil value

EDIT: buffer.close() i meant

[Ta©ti Tac0Z 2]

you mean like this, right:

gfxb.clear()
gfxb.drawChanges(true)

if so then that doesn't work still nothing is drawen secount run

[Ta©ti Tac0Z 2]

i'll make a screen recording tomorrow then i can show you the glicthy ness that comes after secout run

[Molinko 43]

Noah, sometimes, you're just wrong/"don't get it", and that's okay. Fingercomp has tried to demonstrate that although OC has some limitations, they're there for arguably good reasons. Many of your issues in your initial post can be addressed with a config change. As for the buffer library, fingercomp was mentioning that's it's a Singleton. What he's trying to say basically is that the buffer data, or state, will be preserved from one program to the other. If you didn't know this you might think it was a bug... Basically what I'm trying to say is that you could use the forums more appropriately by asking better and more concise questions rather than a string of appearent complaints while also ignorant of the full capabilities of the mod. 

P.s Its not my intention to sound like a butthole..

Edited August 19, 2018 by Molinko
was a bit of a butthole

[Ta©ti Tac0Z 2]

1 hour ago, Molinko said:

Noah, sometimes, you're just wrong/"don't get it"

Thanks for reminding me

1 hour ago, Molinko said:

Noah, sometimes, you're just wrong/"don't get it", and that's okay. Fingercomp has tried to demonstrate that although OC has some limitations, they're there for arguably good reasons. Many of your issues in your initial post can be addressed with a config change. As for the buffer library, fingercomp was mentioning that's it's a Singleton. What he's trying to say basically is that the buffer data, or state, will be preserved from one program to the other. If you didn't know this you might think it was a bug... Basically what I'm trying to say is that you could use the forums more appropriately by asking better and more concise questions rather than a string of appearent complaints while also ignorant of the full capabilities of the mod. 

P.s Its not my intention to sound like a butthole..

You are in genural late if You looked on the recent post you'll see that my issues about the optimiazion as been adreest for long time ago

1 hour ago, Molinko said:

As for the buffer library, fingercomp was mentioning that's it's a Singleton

Yes the problem now is that i can't fiqure out how to reset the singleton, am i allowed to ask how to reset it?

1 hour ago, Molinko said:

P.s Its not my intention to sound like a butthole..

Well am Sorry but You kindof are at the monument, and You are doing a bad job at hiddeing it. I fell like in the event that You fell like You should write that isn't it just Best to just stop there?

it makes it even worse if You are bomb block from CC witch i have the idea that You are

 

1 hour ago, Molinko said:

Basically what I'm trying to say is that you could use the forums more appropriately by asking better and more concise questions rather than a string of appearent complaints

... if i had 10 pence evrey time somebody Said that... i Got banned from reddit (i belive it was) in 4 days becuse of 4 poeple downvoted my qestion nobody Said anything. It's great to get reminded tho Thanks 

 

1 hour ago, Molinko said:

 

[Molinko 43]

I'm not a moderator on these forums. I'm not Bomb block from CC I'm Molinko. I don't go around acting like a king. I attempt to answer questions from people seeking assistance, praise where I'm impressed, or criticism where I think it's due. You've made a post in a support forum basically complaining about the potential of OC. fin.

Edited August 19, 2018 by Molinko
trying not to be rude.

[Ta©ti Tac0Z 2]

Shit Sorry bomb block Said he was one of you am Sorry up curse when You Said mod You meant modification not modutator am Sorry. When thats Said You are begging to get a bad resolut when You say:

1 hour ago, Molinko said:

P.s Its not my intention to sound like a butthole..

You are basicly saying: "p.s i know am a butthole live with it"

i know my learning skills is about at the zero mark but starting out with and i qoute: Noah, sometimes, you're just wrong/"don't get it"

is a great Way to not Being a Leading member i see You used the "deleted" efect on it now tho, how conviniend

 

 

Also as a addisinal thing

1 hour ago, Molinko said:

I attempt to answer questions from people seeking assistance

This is the assistance You have given me in this entire thread:

2 hours ago, Molinko said:

Noah, sometimes, you're just wrong/"don't get it", and that's okay. Fingercomp has tried to demonstrate that although OC has some limitations, they're there for arguably good reasons. Many of your issues in your initial post can be addressed with a config change. As for the buffer library, fingercomp was mentioning that's it's a Singleton. What he's trying to say basically is that the buffer data, or state, will be preserved from one program to the other. If you didn't know this you might think it was a bug... Basically what I'm trying to say is that you could use the forums more appropriately by asking better and more concise questions rather than a string of appearent complaints while also ignorant of the full capabilities of the mod. 

P.s Its not my intention to sound like a butthole..

Ohhh Wait that is a compliant  

also this thread was not meant as a complaint more of a am-complaining-about-some-thing-now-currect-me-please-becuse-i-know-am-wrong and i was my game is pushing 50fps becuse of tjat buffer API am makeing lemmings in OC it works great

[Fingercomp 37]

On 8/19/2018 at 5:53 PM, noahthegame said:

you mean like this, right:

gfxb.clear()
gfxb.drawChanges(true)

if so then that doesn't work still nothing is drawen secount run

This behaviour is strange and indicates there's a bug somewhere. Since the double buffering library is used by MineOS, it would have much more chance of being noticed, so it's more likely there's some problem in your code. Could you show the code you run, please?

[Ta©ti Tac0Z 2]

the code is currenly 400lines long i there for don't want to post (and becuse even if it doesn't look like it i worked a lot for this project)  it here the code is located on my private webserver i don't want to give the hole community what i worked hard on am going to send you the url as a personal message i hope you understand