Jump to content
  • Sky
  • Blueberry
  • Slate
  • Blackcurrant
  • Watermelon
  • Strawberry
  • Orange
  • Banana
  • Apple
  • Emerald
  • Chocolate
  • Charcoal

steel720

Members
  • Content Count

    34
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by steel720

  1. 32 minutes ago, NaeRei said:

    well for the remote screen i was thinking more along the lines of just building the computer where i wanted the screen and extend the cables down to the reactor, taking in to account that its not on another chunk, just way down below, as in bedrock level below. Ill pm XyFreak and ask him directly about the gui thing.

     

    anyway thanks and take care

    do the reactor and the computer need to be in the same chunk ?

  2. 18 hours ago, XyFreak said:

    Hmm I have it running (with burnRFt) on my server though (and its already past the 2mrf/t)...odd

    is there away to boost some more power in the injector so the reactor is safer ? even doe you burn alot of fuel to make rf i just want to know bec the higher preset dosent work in 1.10 bec the field lowers so hard so the reactor can control it bec i dont think the program is controling the input of power to the reactor

  3. 12 minutes ago, corbanj6534 said:

    Is that on 1.10? i had something similar happen recently, but i think that was because of my power source for the shield failing. Just seemed a little too coincidental is all.

    bec on the screen in the start i say that i have 180k rf/T input on the forcefield but i input 200k in the injector so i think its computer problem

  4. and what have i done wrong when they randomly explode test server doe but the reactor was running fine and then it went to critical i am running the

    reactors = { { reactorAddress = "XXXXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX", fluxGateDrainbackAddress = "YYYYYYYY-YYYY-YYYY-YYYY-YYYYYYYYYYYY", fluxGateOutputAddress = "ZZZZZZZZ-ZZZZ-ZZZZ-ZZZZ-ZZZZZZZZZZZZ", drainback = 1.1, targetSaturation = 0.10, throttleSaturation = 0.56, throttleTemperature = 8115, throttleExponent = 0.12, limitTemperature = 10000, limitExponent = 2.79, burnConversion = 0, burnRFt = 2000000 } };  preset 

  5. 19 hours ago, XyFreak said:

    Btw - if you plan on building multiple of these (you already have two?) you may REALLY want to think about using more aggressive presets to get more rf/t ;)

    Now that everything seems to be working i recommend the presets I use (they're on the website) with burnRFt=0 for fuel efficiency or with the 2000000 one for max power gen.

    i was running your program that makes more rf for a while and its still say warning what can the problem be or should it do like that ? and i have problem when i leave the area around my base too do other stuff the chunk unloads and the open computer programs go buggy and almoste makes the reactor over heat

  6. 5 minutes ago, XyFreak said:

    Btw - if you plan on building multiple of these (you already have two?) you may REALLY want to think about using more aggressive presets to get more rf/t ;)

    Now that everything seems to be working i recommend the presets I use (they're on the website) with burnRFt=0 for fuel efficiency or with the 2000000 one for max power gen.

    ah i can test it on one of the reactors

    the containment field is really low in % when you have the higer setings

  7. 6 minutes ago, XyFreak said:

    Warning: Stupid questions ahead!

    • This is what you're getting?
    
    Draconic Control has not been configured yet.
    Please make sure everything is set up correctly and start this program again.
    • Your config file is located at "/etc/draconic_control.cfg"?
    • What does "draconic_control start" say?
    • What does "draconic_control runOnce" say?

    nvm i had the program in the wrong place so thx about that now why is it saying warning on the display when everything is running good ?

  8. 8 minutes ago, XyFreak said:

    Hey guys,

    my email inbox told me that something is going on here :P

    First of all, you CAN use the same controller for multiple reactors. No problems there. However the GUI will only show the first reactor because I never implemented that.

    I've heared that in some cases, the adapter addresses may change and the analyzer will read out the wrong addresses. Please compare the addresses of the adapters to the output of the "components" command. If they're indeed different, this is the second time I've heared of this.

    Also if you are on a server, make sure the computers stay turned on after a server restart. On our server they just shut down. See: https://github.com/MightyPirates/OpenComputers/issues/2185 - exact same issue. Double check it or else you'll be in for a suprise....like me :/.

    yea i have checked the address and they are fine but i have 2 computer for 2 reactors and one of them are working fine but the other computer wont accept my addresses or it say that i have not configured it but i have

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.